Information from the abstract
This study examines educational management in Internet New Media majors across six Chinese universities spanning five institutional categories: two comprehensive universities and one university in each of the science and engineering, teacher-training, media, and arts categories. A mixed-methods design combined 483 valid student questionnaires with interviews involving 15 teachers and 10 educational administrators. A 40-person pilot assessed questionnaire reliability, with dimension-level Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of .898–.913. Descriptive findings and interview accounts were integrated through a policy–practice–effectiveness framework. Students rated curriculum–industry alignment positively (M = 3.92), whereas the student feedback mechanism received a lower rating (M = 3.34). Support for an additional digital feedback platform was also comparatively low (M = 3.42), suggesting that responsiveness and visible follow-up require attention alongside technical access. The media category recorded the highest reported mean scores across the three broad domains, although the lowest-scoring category varied by domain. Five reform strategies addressed curriculum renewal, employment information, student feedback, faculty development, and practice resources. The study’s contribution is an institutional comparison that connects management arrangements with students’ reported experiences and practical reform priorities. The findings support context-sensitive improvement and should be interpreted as descriptive evidence rather than causal effects.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 89/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Online and Blended Learning · E-Learning and COVID-19 · Higher Education Governance and Development
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Chen Liu · Pornchai Nookaew · Supaluk Satpretpry · Jie Wang · Southeast Asia University · Krirk University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.