Information from the abstract
Abstract The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of two intraoral scanners (IOSs) for measuring post space length and area deviation in root canal-treated teeth with differing canal tapers, using a caliper as the reference standard. Fifteen endodontically treated resin teeth (n = 5 per group; maxillary central incisor, first premolar, and first molar) received 10 mm post spaces with sizes No. 2, No. 0.5, and No. 1, respectively. Each specimen was measured 10 times using each method: a digital caliper (reference), a conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression digitized with an extraoral scanner (inEos X5), and two IOSs, IOS-1 (Trios 4) and IOS-2 (CEREC Primescan). STL files were superimposed in OraCheck 5.0 to measure post space length and area deviation. The 10 scans were treated as replicates nested within each specimen in linear mixed-effects models; equivalence was tested using two one-sided tests against a ± 0.10 mm margin, and precision was expressed as the repeatability coefficient. Conventional impressions matched the caliper in every group and were equivalent within ± 0.10 mm. For Tooth 21, both scanners also met the equivalence margin. Both scanners underestimated Tooth 24 (IOS-1 −0.90 mm; IOS-2 −0.61 mm) and overestimated Tooth 26 (IOS-1 +0.28 mm; IOS-2 +0.25 mm), and neither met the equivalence margin (p
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 73/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental materials and restorations · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Dusit Nantanapiboon · Porawit Kamnoedboon · Chawalid Pianmee · Chanakarn Sinsareekul · Piyanee Panitvisai · Chulalongkorn University · Surin Hospital
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.