Information from the abstract
While scholarly attention to journalistic legitimacy is growing, most studies remain concentrated in the West, overlooking the experiences of journalists in the Global South. To redress this gap, this study draws on in-depth interviews with five Muslim minority journalists in Thailand’s Deep South who actively counter Thai state narratives through social media. It examines how these journalists perform boundary work to establish legitimacy while operating amid armed conflict, securitization, and intense state surveillance. The findings identify three emerging practices that enable these minority journalists to claim the role of “partisan truth-teller”. First, they employ social media to assert cultural authority as “partisan narrators” sharing close proximity to local communities marginalized by the Thai state. Second, they use such platforms to challenge the “views” of outsiders and resist the Thai public’s widespread distrust of Malay Muslims. Finally, they confront security authorities, thereby reclaiming citizen rights and advocating for the security of Malay Muslims. In contrast to Western models of journalism as “public service”, this study contends that legitimacy in this context derives mainly from the enactment of “truth” via “partisan and perturbing voices” that defend the rights of Malay Muslim communities in Thailand.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 79/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Asian Studies and History · Media Studies and Communication
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Treepon Kirdnark · Mahidol University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.