Information from the abstract
This study developed and evaluated an educational leadership development model for school administrators in Thailand in the age of disruption. A research and development (R&D) design was implemented in four phases: (1) analysis of current conditions and leadership components, (2) model construction, (3) trial implementation, and (4) model evaluation. The sample consisted of 480 administrators, teachers, and educational personnel selected through stratified random sampling with proportional allocation. The research instruments included a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire, a semi-structured interview protocol, expert evaluation forms, a pre- and post-implementation assessment, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Content validity was examined using the Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) index, and the overall reliability coefficient was high (Cronbach’s alpha = .987). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) supported the factorability of the data. For leadership components, KMO was .953, and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant (chi-square = 18,920.62, p < .001), yielding five components that explained 71.840% of the cumulative variance. For leadership development approaches, KMO was .946, and Bartlett’s Test was significant (chi-square = 23,797.224, p < .001), yielding four components that explained 79.715% of the cumulative variance. Trial implementation showed improvement from M = 3.05 (SD = 0.63) before implementation to M = 4.40 (SD = 0.52) after implementation, with an overall performance increase from 55.56% to 100%. Satisfaction with the model was high (M = 4.19, SD = 0.64). The final evaluation indicated the highest levels of appropriateness (M = 4.60), feasibility (M = 4.66), and utility (M = 4.64). The findings suggest that the model offers a coherent and practical framework for strengthening school administrators’ leadership competencies in disruption-era educational contexts characterized by VUCA and BANI conditions.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 85/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: School Leadership and Teacher Performance · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies · Education and Communication Studies
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Dudsaree Krongyudti · Praiwan Kotta · Chunankid Masena · Saman Asawapoom · Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.