Information from the abstract
This article reconstructs Jain anekāntavāda (the doctrine that reality is many-sided), Marxist ideology-critique, and Kabir’s Sant vernacular philosophy as a shared Indian genealogy of critical theory. These traditions offer tools for questioning hierarchy and epistemic authority. Anekāntavāda’s discipline of qualified assertion functions as a political epistemology that challenges scriptural absolutism and caste ideology. Marxist analysis anchors this critique in the material reproduction of power, illuminating how caste and class are legitimated through religious and ideological apparatuses. Kabir’s vernacular poems translate epistemic pluralism and structural critique into subaltern praxis, articulating anti-caste and anti-sectarian visions accessible beyond textual elites. Through close textual analysis, the article argues that South Asian religious and philosophical traditions are producers of critique in their own right.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 76/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Indian and Buddhist Studies · Study and Philosophy of Religion · South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Pushpraj Singh · Walailak University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.