Information from the abstract
Point-of-sale (POS) technology is central to the digital transformation of small retail businesses, yet little is known about the beliefs that keep current users committed to these systems. This study extends the Technology Acceptance Model with perceived system value and user empowerment as antecedents of POS continuance intention, with trust and satisfaction as mediators. Survey data from 196 Thai small retail entrepreneurs with at least six months of POS use were analyzed with covariance-based structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. User empowerment was the strongest correlate of trust and continuance intention, and its association with continuance intention was almost entirely direct. Perceived system value was consistently associated with satisfaction, but its association with usefulness was not robust across estimators. The associations of usefulness with trust and of satisfaction with continuance intention were not significant, although power to detect them was limited. Both configurations sufficient for high continuance intention combined usefulness, empowerment, and trust, yielding a core that was sensitive to some calibration and threshold choices. Because the sample comprised current users, the design was cross-sectional, and common method variance could not be ruled out, the findings describe associations rather than causes of sustained use. POS providers may benefit from supporting users’ competence and sense of control alongside usefulness and value communication.
Why this record is monitored
This record has an Impact Signal of 72/100 based on recency, source, collaboration, and bibliographic signals. It prioritizes monitoring and is not a judgment of research quality.
Related topics: Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Thai researcher and institutional participation
Jindarat Peemanee · Nuanlaong Attharangsun · Manisara Sananuamengthaisong · Mahasarakham University
Data limitations
This page is a bibliographic record based on abstract-level information, not a full analysis or quality assessment. Verify the DOI and original article before citation.